Somebody has idea why this happened?
I think it happened in all my tables with field "ref" as unique.
UNIQUE index created 20 times
UNIQUE index created 20 times
- Attachments
-
- Selección_011.png (59.82 KiB) Viewed 3388 times
/Giuseppe
Professional Outsourcing Services
Professional Outsourcing Services
-
- AppGini Super Hero
- Posts: 336
- Joined: 2015-12-23 16:52
Re: UNIQUE index created 20 times
No idea on that, DevGiu, but to help out others who may find this post...
I've found it works best in AppGini to use a field named 'id'. AppGini will detect this and automatically set it up to be the primary key field. It's the first field I add when defining a table.
Even when I know I'll have other fields that could be primary, I still let AppGini create the primary key using 'id'. The other field that might have been suitable as primary, I make that field required and unique.
Just a preference, of course, but one I've found makes AppGini work more smoothly.
I've found it works best in AppGini to use a field named 'id'. AppGini will detect this and automatically set it up to be the primary key field. It's the first field I add when defining a table.
Even when I know I'll have other fields that could be primary, I still let AppGini create the primary key using 'id'. The other field that might have been suitable as primary, I make that field required and unique.
Just a preference, of course, but one I've found makes AppGini work more smoothly.
Re: UNIQUE index created 20 times
It's a bug, recognized by AppGini Team.
In my situation, if you look at it, "id" is my PK, the other field is just a varchar field with UNIQUE index.
In my situation, if you look at it, "id" is my PK, the other field is just a varchar field with UNIQUE index.
/Giuseppe
Professional Outsourcing Services
Professional Outsourcing Services
-
- AppGini Super Hero
- Posts: 336
- Joined: 2015-12-23 16:52
Re: UNIQUE index created 20 times
LOL @ ME
Too early in the morning I guess. Completely overlooked that you had 'id' as primary. All those refs to ref overwhelmed me
Too early in the morning I guess. Completely overlooked that you had 'id' as primary. All those refs to ref overwhelmed me